Navigating Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) is a critical skill for freelancers, particularly in the realm of instructional design. Many freelancers (myself included) when just starting out don’t really understand what they are signing and may be putting themselves into harms way. Understanding NDAs for freelancers is not just about signing a document; it’s about protecting your professional future. This post will hopefully help you navigate the standard clauses that you will often see in NDAs, identify the red flags to watch out for, and understand how to propose beneficial revisions that make sure that you are protected as well.
What is an NDA?
NDAs for freelancers, especially those in instructional design, are contracts that define how sensitive information should be treated. They are meant to protect both the client’s proprietary information and the freelancer’s rights. Often times these are very one sided and don’t protect the freelancer, only the client. It is your responsibility to read these documents carefully and identify areas where you might be exposed. Later in the post I’ll mention utilizing legal counsel, but these tips are meant for you to be able to identify these problems prior to contacting legal representation. Also, just to make it clear, I am not a licensed attorney, and this content should not be construed as legal advice. It is based solely on my personal experiences and insights as a freelancer in instructional design. For legal advice specific to your situation, I strongly recommend consulting with a qualified attorney.
Key Elements of a Standard NDA
An NDA’s strength lies in its clarity and fairness. The confidentiality clauses, time period, and specific obligations form the backbone of these agreements, providing a framework that safeguards both the freelancer’s and the client’s interests.
- Confidentiality Clauses: Ensure these clauses are specific. Vague terms can be a breeding ground for legal challenges.
- Time Period: A reasonable time frame for NDAs for freelancers should be negotiated based on the lifespan of the information’s relevance.
- Obligations and Exceptions: Clearly understand your rights and obligations. Exceptions for public domain or independently obtained information should be included.
Section 3: Red Flags in NDAs
NDAs, while protective in nature, can sometimes contain elements that are more restrictive than protective. Identifying red flags is not just about spotting unfavorable terms, but also about understanding how they might impact your freedom and work as a freelancer.
- Vague Language: Push for clarity. If a term is unclear, request a specific definition. Vague language often will protect the client, in the event they want to go after you for a so called violation. A NDA should be clear on exactly what information is protected, how you can use this information, and any exclusions to the agreement. The time frame of the NDA should be explicitly stated, as well as what the specific actions would be (along with damages) would result from a breach.
- Excessive Duration: Most NDAs have a reasonable timeline attached to them, and often with clients that you work with long term, these might need to be renewed. The red flag to look out for is NDAs that last far past the end of a project. I’ve even seen some that don’t even have a date, which legally means that from the time of signing they would apply in perpetuity. If you see this, instead propose a duration that matches the industry standard or the expected lifespan of the information.
- Overreaching Restrictions: The easiest example to cite here is in the breaches portion. A huge red flag in a NDA here would be seeing damages in the millions when the project is only a few thousand dollars. If you agree to this, that means if they find you to have breached the NDA in some way, you are on the hook for that amount. Another restriction that can be overreaching are clauses that limit your future work opportunities. If you see a clause that doesn’t allow you to work with any of their competitors for an extended period of time, or in some way own all of the work you do in a certain timeframe- push back on these. I’d suggest that you propose reasonable restrictions or timeframe limitations.
So what do you do if you identify these red flags and propose edits that they aren’t willing to make? In that case, my advice would be to walk away. It is better to lose that small amount of income then be exposed to that level of liability.
Boilerplate Language and Pushback Points
What do I mean by boilerplate? Often clients will have a legal department that has a NDA that is ready to go and that they send to any contractor that the company uses. This being a template of sorts means that there are going to be terms that don’t apply to every situation. Boilerplate terms in NDAs are standard, but these terms are not always benign. These preset clauses, often overlooked, can carry implications that significantly affect your operational flexibility and legal standing as an instructional designer.
- Non-compete Clauses: Suggest narrowing the scope to specific types of projects or direct competitors only. Also, if you happen to have a pre-existing relationship with a competitor as a client, be sure to have that added into the NDA.
- Indemnification Provisions: Advocate for a balanced approach, where liabilities are fairly distributed based on responsibility. I once had a NDA that put me on the hook legally for all the content even though I was only developing. I pushed back because I had no idea where all the content they generated for the storyboard came from. Be sure that you are taking responsibility only for the things you are directly creating and that anything they provide content, resources, or otherwise is their responsibility. Be sure that this section answers who is responsible for paying damages, what types of damages are covered, as well as how a claim can be made. This serves to help limit your potential liability and mitigate risks.
- Jurisdiction and Dispute Resolution: Jurisdiction indicates where any disputes resulting from the agreement will be handled. You should consider if this location is appropriate and what the state laws are in that jurisdiction about NDAs.
Protecting Your Interests
In the world of freelancing, your greatest asset is your autonomy. Protecting your interests in an NDA negotiation goes beyond legalities; it’s about preserving your professional integrity and ensuring your future work is unencumbered.
- Legal Counsel: Always get NDAs for freelancers reviewed by a legal professional, especially when dealing with complex projects.
- Negotiation Tactics: Emphasize your willingness to work collaboratively while ensuring your interests are not sidelined.
- Trust Your Instincts: If an NDA puts unfair liability on you or feels overly restrictive, consider walking away. The financial implications of a bad NDA can far outweigh the immediate gains of a project.
The Power to Walk Away
Remember, not all projects are worth your peace of mind. NDAs for freelancers should be a shield, not a chain. If negotiating fails to remove unfair clauses, walking away might be your best strategy. Losing one project could be a small price to pay compared to potential legal issues or career limitations down the line.
Conclusion
For instructional designers, NDAs for freelancers are a part of professional life. By understanding these agreements, advocating for fair terms, and knowing when to walk away, you protect not just your current project, but your entire freelance career. With this knowledge, approach each NDA with confidence and clarity, ensuring that your work is protected, and your professional future is secure.
If you’ve found this guide on NDAs for freelancers helpful, I encourage you to share your experiences and questions in the comments below. Let’s continue this conversation and support each other in navigating the complexities of freelance contracts in instructional design!



